Notes |
- In the 1910 census Charles and Rose have several children living with them ( children who may not be their own children since they had been married for only six years): Mary, age 15, Clara, age 10, Merta, age 9, Frederick, age 8, Margaret, age 7, Rose age 5, and their son Karl age 3.
In the 1920 census, the only children listed in the household of Charles and Rose are their sons Karl and Allan.
In the 1930 US census both brothers appear again together as boarders in San Francisco, California.
In the 1930 US census Rose (McKeown) Bausch, age 58, is listed as a widow in the household of her brother Howard McKeown in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
[4]
- Mrs. Rose Bausch and boys, Karl and Allen, left his week for Casper, Wyo., to make their home, as Mr. Bausch is located there, working at his trade, that of carpenter and contractor. They would have gone sooner, but the boys were students in the Rushville schools and their parents wished them to remain until the close of school.
Sheridan County Star, Rushville, Nebraska. Friday, 23 May 1924.
[5]
- Mrs. Rose Bausch and son Karl returned Wednesday from Casper. We understand that it is the intention of the family to again locate here, as times in Casper are on the decline and there is little doing there. Besides, the boys wish to attend the Rushville schools.
Sheridan County Star, Rushville, Nebraska. Friday, 29 August 1924.
[5]
- Mrs. Rose Bausch and son Allan of Rushville were in town from Wednesday until Thursday morning visiting friends, while on their way from Rushville to Tulsa, Oklahoma where they will make their home with her brother, Dr. McKeown. Carl, the older boy is in San Francisco where he is a draughtsman for a big electrical company.
The Frontier and Holt county Independent, O’Neill, Nebraska. Friday, 6 April 1928.
[5]
- Asks $20,000 in Alienation Suite
O’Neill, Neb., Aug. 14 – Mrs. Rose Bausch, by her attorney M.F. Harrington, has filed in the office of the clerk of the district court a petition asking for $20,000 damages from Mary A. Chase, of Page, Nebraska for alleged alienation of affections of her husband, Charles Bausch.
The Orchard News, Orchard, Nebraska. Friday, 17 August 1928.
[5]
- Bausch vs Chase Case Dismissed In District Court
The alienation of affection case of Bausch vs. Chase “blew up” in court Tuesday afternoon and was dismissed on motion of the plaintiffs attorney. This is the case wherein Mrs. Rose Bausch sues Mrs. Chase for $20,000 claiming that Mrs. Chase had taken the affections of her husband, Charles Bausch, from her to the above amount. A jury had been selected and Rose Bausch put on the stand, and after a few questions a letter was presented as evidence by the defendant that Mrs. Bausch had written to Henry Bausch sometime ago. The jury was excused while the letter was being submitted and after reading the letter, M.F. Harrington who represented the plaintiff, asked to have the case dismissed saying it was not his case and he had not gone into it, and that he had no knowledge of conditions as stated in the latter.
The judge dismissed the case.
The Frontier and Holt county Independent, O’Neill, Nebraska. Friday, 22 March 1929.
[5]
- Audience Disappointed When Case Is Dismissed
A court room filled with an attentive crowd apparently eager to hear morsels of scandal, became an audience disappointed when the 25 thousand dollar alienation of affection suit of Mrs. Rose Bausch against Mrs. Mary A. Chase was dismissed by Judge Dickson in district court Tuesday, after counsel for the plaintiff withdrew from the case.
Mrs. Bausch sued Mrs. Chase for damages sustained, she alleged, bu the alienation of her husband’s affections by the defendant. The plaintiff took the stand and testified to her relationship with her husband prior to the time she alleged he became acquainted and infatuated with Mrs. Chase. On cross examination she admitted writing a lengthy letter to a brother of her husband. This letter was then turned over to her lawyer for approval or objection. Upon reading the letter, counsel for Mrs. Bausch withdrew from the case, claiming that his client had not told him the truth about the matter.
The plaintiff thereupon requested the court to dismiss the case without prejudice to a future action. This was complied with and the jury discharged from further service in the case. M.F. Harrington was attorney for the plaintiff and J.D. Cronin for defendant.
The Atkinson Graphic, Atkinson, Nebraska. Friday, 22 March 1929, page 1.
[5]
|